Tài liệu Out of pocket payment for health care in vietnam: An example from the case of appendectomy treatment at sonla general provincial hospital in 2012–2013 – Nguyen Duc Toan: Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
124
OUT OF POCKET PAYMENT FOR HEALTH CARE IN VIETNAM:
AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CASE OF APPENDECTOMY TREATMENT
AT SONLA GENERAL PROVINCIAL HOSPITAL IN 2012 - 2013
Nguyen Duc Toan1; Pham Le Tuan2; Quach Thi Can3
SUMMARY
Objectives: To calculate the out of pocket payment for the case of appendectomy treatment
at Sonla General Provincial Hospital in 2012 - 2013. Subjects and methods: All of 322
appendicitis patients who were treated at Sonla General Provincial Hospital from Jan 2012 to
Dec 2013 were interviewed by using a structured questionnaire. The direct cost for treatment of
patients was also collected using payment receipts from the hospital. Data were analyzed using
the STATA version 14.0. Results and conclusion: The study found the out of pocket payment
for appendectomy treatment was 2.228 million VND and accounted for 43.8% of the total
direct cost. The corresponding figure for patients with health insuran...
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: Đình Chiến | Ngày: 06/07/2023 | Lượt xem: 301 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Out of pocket payment for health care in vietnam: An example from the case of appendectomy treatment at sonla general provincial hospital in 2012–2013 – Nguyen Duc Toan, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
124
OUT OF POCKET PAYMENT FOR HEALTH CARE IN VIETNAM:
AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CASE OF APPENDECTOMY TREATMENT
AT SONLA GENERAL PROVINCIAL HOSPITAL IN 2012 - 2013
Nguyen Duc Toan1; Pham Le Tuan2; Quach Thi Can3
SUMMARY
Objectives: To calculate the out of pocket payment for the case of appendectomy treatment
at Sonla General Provincial Hospital in 2012 - 2013. Subjects and methods: All of 322
appendicitis patients who were treated at Sonla General Provincial Hospital from Jan 2012 to
Dec 2013 were interviewed by using a structured questionnaire. The direct cost for treatment of
patients was also collected using payment receipts from the hospital. Data were analyzed using
the STATA version 14.0. Results and conclusion: The study found the out of pocket payment
for appendectomy treatment was 2.228 million VND and accounted for 43.8% of the total
direct cost. The corresponding figure for patients with health insurance was 1.822 million VND
and 34.4%. The better health insurance coverage will reduce the out of pocket.
* Keywords: Appendectomy treatment; Out of pocket payment; General provincial hospital.
INTRODUCTION
Out-of-pocket payments (OOPs) are
defined as direct payments made by
individuals to health care providers at the
time of service use. This excludes any
prepayment for health services, for
example in the form of taxes or specific
insurance premiums or contributions and,
where possible, net of any reimbursements
to the individual who made the payments [8].
Reducing the OOP for health care is a
trying of any government in developing
countries in order to get equity in health
care. In Vietnam, National health insurance
was introduced in 1992. Time by time,
the health insurance (HI) coverage has
increased and it’s an important factor
effecting to reduce the OOP. There are
some studies in Vietnam to look at the
OOP and/or financial burden of household
in general [5, 6] or a group of diseases,
like non comunicable disease [4] but it’s
limitation of OOP for Sonla province
specially and for the whole of Vietnam in
generally. So that, this study was conducted
with aim: To calculate the out of pocket
payment for the case of appendectomy
treatment at Sonla General Provincial
Hospital in 2012 - 2013.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1. Subjects.
322 patients who were hospitalized for
appendectomy treatment during the period
from Jan 2012 to December 2013.
1. ENT Hospital, Hochiminh City
2. Medicine and Pharmacy University
3. Medicine and Pharmacy University
Corresponding author: Nguyen Duc Toan (@gmail.com)
Date received: 01/08/20181
Date accepted: 24/09/2018
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
125
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1. Subjects.
322 patients who were hospitalized for
appendectomy treatment during the period
from Jan 2012 to December 2013.
2. Methods.
* Study design and setting: It was a
cross sectional study during the time from
Jan 2012 to Dec 2013 at the Sonla General
Provincial Hospital.
* Data collection:
Face-to-face interview using a structured
questionnaire was conducted with either
patients themselves or their close relatives.
The interview was conducted immediately
after hospitalization at patients’room.
The longest interval was 3 months.
Interviewers included 15 medical doctors
who worked at the general provincial
hospital. However, some expenditure also
got from the Finance Department of the
Hospital.
* Data analysis: STATA program
version 14.0 was used for data analysis.
The costs were calculated by using mean
(SD) and median (25 - 75%). The non-
parameter Mann-Whitney test was used
for testing the difference in the cost
between different groups.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
* Characteristics of patients:
Among 322 patients studied, more than 80% were from 18 to 60 years old and up.
The mean of age was 41.7 ± 18.2 years. The proportion of male and female was 53.1%
and 46.9%, respectively. The main occupation was farmer (35.4%), following public
servants (19.9%). Unemployment was accounted for 13.7%. The patients had HI was
265 patients (82.3%), among them only 10 patients covered 100% by HI. Average
duration time for appendectomy treatment was about 5 days. These figures were
similar to the information from 103 Military Hospital [3]. The number of appendectomy
cases at Sonla General Provincial Hospital in 2012 and 2013 were about almost the
same as number of that at 103 Military Hospital in 1995 [3].
Table 1: Direct cost for one case of appendectomy treatment.
Unit: Million VND
Cost
Median (25 - 75%)
p*
With HI (n = 265) Without HI (n = 57)
Direct medical cost 4,400 (2,698 - 5,271) 3,200 (2,494 - 4,471) < 0,05
Paid by HI 3,436 (1,669 - 4,466) 0 < 0,05
Paid by patients 0,474 (0,277 - 1,050) 3,200 (2,494 - 4,471) < 0,05
Direct non-medical cost 0,650 (0,430 - 1,030) 0,620 (0,410 - 0,900) > 0,05
Indirect cost 0,420 (0 - 0,900) 0,500 (0 - 1,000) > 0,05
Total cost 5,504 (3,766 - 6,985) 4,478 (3,400 - 5,902) < 0,05
(* Mann-Whitney test)
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
126
There was about 18% of studied patients having no HI. The difference between
group with and without HI was statistically significant for some comparison except the
direct non-medical cost and indirect cost.
(*: Direct cost and OOP were significantly different between different groups).
Figure 1: Average OOP and HI payment for direct cost (Unit: thousand VND).
For the patients without IH, they had
to pay 100%, while the patients with HI
had to pay 34.4% for direct cost of
appendectomy treatment. The OOP
percentage was different from year 2012
and 2013 and from open surgery and
laparoscopy. In general, the OOP was
2,228 million VND and accounted for
almost 44.0% of total direct cost. The
direct cost and OOP were statistically
significant difference by years, surgery
methods and between those with and
without HI (p < 0.05). So far, we have not
found the timing relevant figures to compare
with the result of our study. But in
Pakistan in 2004 - 2004, OOP on health
care was 67% [6]. Hoang Van Minh and
others showed OOP in Vietnam at some
points of time was much lower than that
from our study: in 2002; 2004; 2006; 2008
and 2010 was VND 67,300; VND 126,400;
VND 114,000; VND 201,300; and VND
243,000, respectively [5]. The difference
between OOP absolute figures in Hoang
Van Minh,s study and our study can be
explained by the methodology. We just
calculated OOP for a specific acute case
at one province while Hoang Van Minh
analyzed data from a sery of National
surveys.
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
127
Table 2: Detail direct cost for appendectomy treatment.
Unit: Million VND
Cost item
Paid by HI Paid by patients (OOP)
Median
(25 - 75%)
Mean ± SD %
Median
(25 - 75%)
Mean ± SD %
Laboratory test
0.268
(0 - 0.473)
0.296 ± 0.262 62.4
0.081
(0.028 - 0.322)
0.178 ± 0.200 37.6
Medicines
0.925
(0 - 1.509)
1.324 ± 1.979 70.1
0.245
(0.090 - 0.104)
0.564 ± 0.636 29.9
Operation
0.978
(0 - 1.794)
1.045 ± 1.012 63.1
0.210
(0.068 - 0.595)
0.610 ± 0.853 36.9
Consumables
0.045
(0 - 0.076)
0.051 ± 0.059 66.2
0,011
(0.004 - 0.046)
0.026 ± 0.030 33.8
Consultation
and bed
0.037
(0 - 0.228)
0.138 ± 0.187 63.0
0.060
(0.008 - 0.108)
0.081 ± 0.095 37.0
Others (Direct
non-medical)
0 0 0
0.650
(0.430 - 0.980)
0.768 ± 0.462 100.0
All patients
2.537
(0 - 4.181)
2.856 2.973 56.2
1.564
(1.027 - 2.901)
2.228 ± 1.696 43.8
All direct non-medical payment was covered by 100% patients. Beside as it included
transportation fees, food, accommodation for the patients and their relatives. For all
patients, the expenditures for medicine was accounted for nearly 30%. These figures
came not only from non-insured patients but from all patients together. The result
looked like that as there are lists of tests and of medicines that HI will cover. The tests
or medicines are not included in the lists patients have to pay regardless with or without
IH. For example, the test to detect is not included in the list.
Table 3: Expenditure for medicines of appendectomy treatment.
Unit: thousand VND
Kind of
Medicines
Paid by HI (n = 322) OOP (n = 322)
p
Mean (25 - 75%) % Median (25 - 75%) %
Antibiotics 0.714 ± 0.977 53.9 0.363 ± 0.417 64.4 < 0.05
Painkiller 0.162 ± 0.161 12.2 0.097 ± 0.121 17.2 < 0.05
Infusion 0.318 ± 0.844 24.0 0.080 ± 0.113 14.2 < 0.05
Other medicines 0.131 ± 0.571 9.9 0.024 ± 0.097 4.2 < 0.05
Total 1.324 ± 1.979 100 0.564 ± 0.636 100 < 0.05
The biggest parts of OOP medicines were for antibiotics and painkillers. It’s
reasonable because the operated patients are suffering from the pain and have high
risk with infection.
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
128
The table 4 showed that the higher
income patients had the less paid by HI.
The patients who paid all by themself had
daily income almost three time higher
than that of patients who were totally
covered by HI. It’s not be sure to say that
the better income group had no HI.
Appendectomy treatment can be done at
district hospitals and the HI will pay for
insured patients but for some cases the
insured want to take health service at
higher level and they are able and happy
to pay.
The study had some limitation, such as:
- Recall bias could be existed in the
case of the interviewing was conducted
long time after the hospitalization.
- It did not include the household
income and economical quintile groups,
therefore we cannot calculate the
economical burden of the household in
general and for each quintile group.
- It just look at OOP for one acute
condition (one episode) at individual level
but not for the whole family for longer time
period (usually one year).
Table 4: OOP payment in comparison with studied patients’ income.
Unit: thousand VND
Subject OOP Average daily Income Ratio
Totally covered by HI (n = 10) 650,0 36.0 18.1
Partly covered by HI (n = 265) 1,959.5 94.4 20.8
Totally covered by OOP (n = 57) 4,478.0 107.7 41.6
All patients 2,270.7 94.9 23.9
Averagely, the patients had to pay 23.9 daily income for appendectomy treatment at
the province hospital. The figure for patients with totally covered by HI, partly covered
by HI and totally covered by themselves was 18.1; 20.8 and 41.6 daily income,
respectively. The more covered by HI the less daily income was.
CONCLUSION
The average OOP for appendectomy
treatment at Sonla General Provincial
Hospital in 2012 and 2013 for all patients
was 2,228 million VND and accounted
for 43.8% of total direct cost. The
corresponding figure for patients with HI
was 34.4%. The better HI coverage will
reduce the OOP.
REFERENCES
1. The Sonla provincial ethnic committee.
The report N
0
53/BC-BDT on the situation of
ethnic minorities and the implementation of
policies for small ethnic minority groups. 2018.
2. The Ministry of Labour, Invalids and
Social Affairs. Decision 749/QĐ-LDTBXH
dated 13
rd
May 2013 approving the results of
the survey on poor households. 2013.
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
8-2018
129
3. 103 Military Hospital. Acute appendicitis.
Internet access, available on 3
rd
Sept. 2018.
4. Vu Duy Kien, Hoang Van Minh, Kim Bao
Giang, Amy Dao, Le Thanh Tuan and Nawi
Ng. Socioeconomic inequalities in catatrophic
health expenditure and impoverishment
associated with non-communicable disease in
urban Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal
for Equity in Health. 2016, 5, 169. DOI
10.1186/s12939-016-0460-3.
5. Hoang Van Minh, Nguyen Thi Kim
Phuong, Privanka Saksena Chris D.James,
Ke Xu. Financial burden of household out-of
pocket health expenditure in Viet Nam: Findings
from the National living standard survey
2002 - 2010. Social Science & Medicine. 2012,
pp.1-6.
6. Ashar Muhammad, Azam Syed. Socio-
economic determinants of household out-of-
pocket payments on healthcare in Pakistan.
Int J. Equity Health. 2012, pp.11-51.
7. Natascha Wagner, Stella Quimbo,
Riti Shimkhada, John Peabody. Does health
insurance coverage or improved quality
protect better against out-of-pocket payment?
Experimental evidence from the Philippines.
Social Science & Medicine. 2018, 204, pp.51-58.
8. WHO. Out-of-pocket payments, user
fees and catastrophic expenditure
www.who.int/health_financing/topics/financial-
protection/out...pocket-payments.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- out_of_pocket_payment_for_health_care_in_vietnam_an_example.pdf