Tài liệu Báo cáo Nghiên cứu khoa học Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to the development of marine finfish farming in Australia and Vietnam: Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 1
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development
PROGRESS REPORT
Intensive in-pond floating raceway production of marine finfish
(CARD VIE 062/04)
MILESTONE REPORT NO.8
Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to
the development of marine finfish farming
in Australia and Vietnam
Tung Hoang1, Michael Burke2 & Daniel Willet2
1 Nha Trang University, Vietnam
2 Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, Australia
April 2008
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 2
PREFACE
The CARD VIE062/04 Project “Intensive inpond floating raceway production of marine finfish”
aimed to develop an innovative nursing and growing system for marine finfish, i.e. floating
receways using existing pond farming infrastructrure in coastal areas of Vietnam and Australia.
Started in August 2005 this project was expected to help develop marine finfish farming in both
countries by increasing the pro...
20 trang |
Chia sẻ: haohao | Lượt xem: 1252 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Báo cáo Nghiên cứu khoa học Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to the development of marine finfish farming in Australia and Vietnam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 1
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development
PROGRESS REPORT
Intensive in-pond floating raceway production of marine finfish
(CARD VIE 062/04)
MILESTONE REPORT NO.8
Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to
the development of marine finfish farming
in Australia and Vietnam
Tung Hoang1, Michael Burke2 & Daniel Willet2
1 Nha Trang University, Vietnam
2 Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, Australia
April 2008
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 2
PREFACE
The CARD VIE062/04 Project “Intensive inpond floating raceway production of marine finfish”
aimed to develop an innovative nursing and growing system for marine finfish, i.e. floating
receways using existing pond farming infrastructrure in coastal areas of Vietnam and Australia.
Started in August 2005 this project was expected to help develop marine finfish farming in both
countries by increasing the production of large fingerlings of marine finfish in Vietnam and grow-
out production in Australia. Since then the CARD VIE062/04 Project had maintained its efforts in
both floating raceway technology development and extension services. This report is to highlight
a number of immediate effects of the project on the local fish farming industries. The report has
two parts: one for the Australian component and the other for the Vietnamese component.
Needless to say that the short duration of the project, i.e. two years, is certaintly not enough for
any ambitious goal, particularly when this new technology was still under development. The
closing of the project in late 2007 was just the start of a process of introducing floating raceway
technology extensively in the two countries. Thus, the impact of this new technology will become
obvious in a few years.
We would like to express our sincere thanks to the CARD Program, Queensland Department of
Primary Industries & Fisheries, Nha Trang University, Khanh Hoa Fisheries Extension Center
(KFEC) for their consistent supports to this project. Thanks are extended to Dr. Adrian Collins,
Mr. Benjamin Russels, BIARC’ staff, Mr. Luu The Phuong, Mr. Ngo Van Manh, Mr. Huynh Kim
Khanh, Ms. Banh Thi Quyen Quyen, the technicians working at the research station of KFEC in
Ninh Loc and a number of BSc students at Nha Trang University who had dedicated their time
and effort making this project a success in several aspects.
The CARD VIE062/04 Project Team
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 3
Part 1
Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to the
development of marine finfish farming in Australia
1. TARGET BENEFICIARIES AND DEMONSTRATED BENEFITS
Beneficiaries of raceway technology development in Australia are principally from the growout
sector. In particular, advantages have been identified for growout operations in non-specific and
permanent water bodies (that is, water bodies not established especially for aquaculture
including existing reservoirs and agricultural farm dams). In these situations, floating raceways
were seen as the preferred production system due to cost effectiveness in construction and the
improved management they offer in terms of stock inventory, feeding, growth and disease
monitoring, predator control and harvesting. Several Queensland operators have either
established or are investigating floating raceway use for these situations.
While initial evaluations of this technology proposed its suitability for existing prawn farmers
wishing to diversify into finfish growout, uptake in this sector has been limited to date, although
some interest has been registered by two Queensland prawn farms. One possible disadvantage
of this technology for prawn farms is that existing ponds are often shallow meaning that the
raceways will be in close contact with the pond bottom. This interferes with preferred water flow
patterns in ponds whereby currents are baffled by the raceway structure. The management of
flow patterns in these ponds is important for controlling settlement of particulate matter, which in
turn affects water quality management. This will become more of an issue as pond water
exchange is reduced.
Periodic draining of these small ponds (which occurs seasonally in prawn production for crop
harvesting) is also standard practice for managing the build up of organic material. Draining
ponds containing raceway infrastructure can be problematic with raceways constructed out of
HDPE sheet material as it is unable to support the weight of the floating walkways out of water.
In this case, at least partial dismantling or removal of the raceway components would generally
be required if draining ponds.
Our experience at BIARC has demonstrated that the marine raceways tended to accumulate
epiphytic growth on surfaces. The airlift system was designed to be easily removed for cleaning;
however the pontoon structure also requires periodic cleaning to remove fouling material, which
is a significantly more difficult operation.
The goal of the current CARD project was to develop a production system with low construction
costs. While this project delivered an efficient and low cost system, many of these identified
operational constraints could be rectified by modifying the raceway design; for instance, by using
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 4
more rigid construction materials such as moulded plastic or fibreglass which was capable of
supporting its own weight out of water. Of course, this would make construction costs
significantly more expensive and the increased costs of a rigid raceway system may not
necessarily be justified against the inconvenience of managing the flexible HDPE sheet
raceways. This would be dependant on individual farm circumstances.
SUMMARY
Advantages
• Cost effectiveness in construction.
• Improved management in terms of stock inventory, feeding, growth and disease
monitoring, predator control and harvesting.
• Airlift system easily removed for cleaning
• Ideal for non-specific water bodies where other aquaculture production systems are
unsuitable
Disadvantages
• Can baffle water circulation in shallow ponds.
• Flexible HDPE raceways need to be partially dismantled or removed when pond is
drained.
• Build up of epiphytic growth which requires periodic cleaning
2. TECHNOLOGY UPTAKE
There has been considerable interest in this project’s demonstration of low-cost floating
raceways for fish growout. The technology has been extended to local industry through
presentations at the WAS 2006 Conference in Adelaide; at an Extension Workshop for state-
wide Queensland Fisheries Service staff in October 2006; and at the Aquaculture Association of
Queensland Conference in 2007. In addition, regular visiting groups to BIARC including
government delegations, industry representatives and student groups have been briefed on the
system.
While it is expected to take some time to see the full flow of benefits to industry from this work,
new uses for raceway production systems are being developed, including fish culture integrated
within existing agriculture farms, in municipal wastewater ponds and in extracted groundwater.
The following list details current specific interest and uptake of this technology in Queensland:
• Kilcoy Fish Company (KFC) worked closely with CARD project staff to establish a
floating raceway culture system within an existing 7 hectare water reservoir on a dairy
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 5
farm. The system consists of a series of 40m3 growout raceways, each 12 m long and
2.4 m wide. System design was based on the low-cost HDPE configuration used in
the CARD project (Fig 1). Fish species cultured include Murray cod (Maccullochela
peelii) (Fig 2) and jade perch (Scortum barcoo). The farm has been successful in
growing Murray cod at densities greater than 100 kg/m3 and has been selling fish to
market since 2006.
• Integrated Recycle International Ltd (IRI) has adopted a modified raceway design for a
new large-scale Queensland enterprise that aims to produce fish in wastewater for
fishmeal production. The raceway design is based on the low-cost HDPE
configuration developed in this CARD project. In this instance, fish will feed
exclusively on natural productivity in the lagoon which is cycled through raceways via
the airlifts The IRI venture will be established at Hervey Bay on Queensland’s Fraser
Coast, and will utilise water stored in municipal tertiary treated effluent ponds
managed by the local government authority. Preliminary trials have identified a
suitable native fish candidate, and work has commenced in building floating pontoon
infrastructure (Fig 3).
Figure 1. Floating raceway system at the Kilcoy Fish Company’s farm. The design
was based on the low-cost HDPE configuration used in the CARD project.
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 6
Figure 2. Murray cod grown in the floating raceway system at the KFC farm.
Figure 3. Aerial view of the floating raceway system under construction at Hervey
Bay, Queensland as part of the IRI fishmeal production project. Fifty-four HDPE
raceways, each 58 m3 capacity, will be suspended between the floating pontoons.
• The use of floating raceways for growing marine fish in ponds containing saline
groundwater extracted from coal seam gas mining is currently being investigated, with
much of the production modelling based on data generated in this CARD project.
• Seafarm, a large prawn farm in North Queensland, has requested specific information
on raceway specifications for future diversification opportunities. Their interest lays
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 7
particularly in the growout of reef fish species within existing prawn ponds and intake
channels.
• Gold Coast Marine Aquaculture (GCMA), a large prawn farm on the Logan River in
South Queensland, is collaborating with BIARC staff to develop cobia (Rachycentron
canadum) production. BIARC staff are currently holding 16 broodstock for planned
fingerling production trials in 2008 with weaned fingerlings to be sent to GCMA for
growout. Floating raceways will be trialled as the preferred growout facility.
3. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS/COST OF PRODUCTION
Floating raceways, as demonstrated by the technology uptake above, have diverse application
ranging from freshwater, inland saline groundwater and marine growout of high quality table fish
for human consumption to mass production of lower order detritivorous fish in wastewater for
fishmeal production. Because of these diverse applications and varying economies of scale,
sizes of raceway infrastructure and feeding requirements it is difficult to generalise on costs of
production. For instance, this technology has been adopted by IRI Ltd who has plans to grow
detritivorous fish in municipal wastewater for fishmeal production. Here fish will feed exclusively
on natural productivity in the lagoon which is cycled through 54 large (58m3) raceways via the
airlifts. This means that feed expenses are removed from the production costs; however, the
product (as a commodity) will achieve a lower market price and the operation relies on
economies of scale in the order of 600 tonnes/year production to be profitable.
For the current evaluation, however, the more generic use of raceways for medium value finfish
production (such as barramundi) is considered. Based on Australian conditions, our estimations
of running costs, capital set up and depreciation, labour, feed inputs and operating we have
determined that raceways are an economically viable alternative for grow-out production of
marine finfish but again, like all systems, there needs to be an economy of scale and regular
supply to good markets. In our estimation, and based on previous experience with the
barramundi industry in Australia, it is proposed that an aquaculture operation needs to produce
at least 1000 kg/week for market to gain production efficiencies. This equates to 26 grow-out
raceways of the size used in the current trial (20m3). This production level would establish an
aquaculture operation in the market place and would demand competitive buying and selling
power. Currently our best estimate for cost of production in trial raceways is approximately
AUD$8/kg. This will improve over time and compares well with other production systems but
without the large capital input.
One of the tangible advantages of raceway production is the lack of initial capital set up costs for
ponds or recirculation operations which frequently run into the 100’s of 1000’s of $AUD for
relatively small operations. Raceways are designed to be self contained production units
requiring only a supply of air and a body of water (of appropriate quality) to float them in.
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 8
Construction costs will also reduce as large scale production develops and raceway size is
progressively made larger. This is evident from just our simple comparison of Grow-Out
Raceway construction costs ($130/m3) Vs Nursery raceway construction costs ($335/m3).
Labour costs will also reduce comparatively with larger system and more economy of scale.
The barramundi industry in Qld currently utilises 1 FTE per 16 ton of barramundi produced. Our
raceway trial utilised the equivalent of 1 FTE for the production of 10 ton (Table 1). This is a
good achievement for a new experimental system to come close to other production systems
that have been in place for many years, and with increasing economies of scale this would be
further improved.
Table 3. Routine Labour Requirement for 4 x Nursery and 2 x Grow-out Raceways at BIARC.
Procedure Frequency Time (hrs/week)
Water Quality/Pond Management 2 x Daily 4.25
Feeding 2 x Daily 7.5
Cleaning intake/outlet screens 2 x weekly x 6 units 4.5
Cleaning uplifts 1 x month x 6 units 2
Total Routine Labour 18.25 hrs/week for 54,400
litre raceway system
(approx AUD$6/wk/m3)
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 9
Part 2
Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to the
development of marine finfish farming in Vietnam
1. TARGET BENEFICIARIES
The primary target beneficiaries in Vietnam include:
• Fish farmers who conduct either fingerling or grow-out productions of marine fish
• Prawn farmers those want to use their exisiting pond infrastructure to nurse or grow
marine fish
• The local marine fish farming industry as a whole
2. DEMONSTRATED BENEFITS
2.1 System comparisons and cost analysis
2.1.1 Advantages of using floating raceways
Vietnam is developing mariculture with focus on both crustaceans (penaeid prawns, mud crabs
and spiny rock lobsters) and marine finfish (barramundi, groupers, cobia, etc.). For fingerling
production conventional nursing systems include concrete tanks, earthern ponds or small sea
cages. The disadvantages of these systems for fingerling production of marine finfish can be
summarized as shown in Table 1 and interestingly all can be well addressed by the use of
floating raceways.
Table 1: Disadvantages of conventional systems for fingerling production of
marine finfish in Vietnam are well addressed by floating raceway technology
Systems Disadvantages Floating raceway
Concrete
tank
• High investment cost
• High operation cost
• Low stocking density
• Limited in nursing area
• Less expensive, more mobile
• Lower operation cost
• Very high stocking density
• Less limitation with area
Earthern
pond
• Difficult for management (feed,
health, grading and harvest)
• Large variation of fish size
• Low stocking density
• Low control of predation and
fish health
• Highly effective in management
(feed, health, grading, harvest)
• Lower as grading is easy
• Very high stocking density
• Full control over predation and
fish health
Sea cage • Not possible for small • Can even adopt fish at smaller
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 10
fingerlings newly discharged
from hatcheries
• Low control over predation and
fish health
sizes compared with the normally
discharged from hatcheries
• Full control over predation and
fish health
The only two disadvantages of floating raceways, given the development context of
Vietnam, include its power-driven operation and relatively high investment cost for poor farmers.
Anyway, it is not expected that every farm should have its own floating raceway system, but a
group of farms. This way the costs can be shared among the partners and resources are utilized
efficiently.
2.1.2 Economic analysis
The advantage of using floating raceways for advanced nursing of marine finfish fingerlings
was also demonstrated in terms of economic gains in comparison to the two possible
conventional nursing systems, i.e. concrete tank and earthern pond. Sea cage is not considered
as this system is not suitable for nursing small fingerlings and experience in Vietnam so far has
shown mass mortality in advanced nursing of different species of marine fish when sea cage
was used as nursing facility. For comparison purpose, SMART-2 floating raceway is used.
Table 2: Capital and operation costs for a three-unit SMART-2 floating raceway system. All
costs are valid for early 2008.
Items Unit cost
(mil VND)
Cost
(mil VND)
CAPITAL COSTS
03 SMART-2 floating raceways 22 66
Two air-blowers (second-handed) 4 8
Pipes, electrical accessories 4 4
3 years rent of a coastal reservoir pond (5,000 m2) 15 45
TOTAL
OPERATION COSTS for barramundi (1.5-month crop) (mil VND) (mil VND)
120,000 small fingerlings (2 cm total length) 120
Feed (INVE and GROBEST) 10
Electricity 2 3
2 workers 2 6
Consumables and others 10
System depreciation (for 36 months)*1.5 months 3.2 5.1
TOTAL 154.1
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 11
OPERATION COSTS for groupers (1.5-month crop) (mil VND) (mil VND)
60,000 small fingerlings (4-5 cm total length) 360
Feed (INVE and GROBEST) 15
Electricity 2 3
2 workers 2 6
Consumables and others 10
System depreciation (for 36 months)*1.5 months 3.2 5.1
TOTAL 399.1
OPERATION COSTS for cobia (1.5-month crop) (mil VND) (mil VND)
45,000 small fingerlings (4-5 cm total length) 220
Feed (INVE and GROBEST) 15
Electricity 2 3
2 workers 2 6
Consumables and others 10
System depreciation (for 36 months)*1.5 months 3.2 5.1
TOTAL 259.1
PRODUCTION COST (VND/fish)
Barramundi Grouper Cobia Survival
(%) No. of fish Prod. cost No. of fish Prod. cost No. of fish Prod. cost
50
60,000
2,568
30,000
13,303
22,500
11,516
60
72,000
2,140
36,000
11,086
27,000
9,596
70
84,000
1,835
42,000
9,502
31,500
8,225
75
90,000
1,712
45,000
8,869
33,750
7,677
80
96,000
1,605
48,000
8,315
36,000
7,197
85
102,000
1,511
51,000
7,825
38,250
6,774
90
108,000
1,427
54,000
7,391
40,500
6,398
95
114,000
1,352
57,000
7,002
42,750
6,061
The likely survival after 40 – 45 days of advanced nursing is 70% for barramundi, 90% for
groupers and 60% for cobia. If this level of performance is achieved, the floating raceways can
compete with any other nursing system including the two conventional ones (concrete tank and
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 12
earthern pond) as production cost is far lower than market price (Table 3). Higher survivals can
be achieved if management protocol (water quality control, grading, feeding, health care, etc.) is
strictly followed and the quality of the purchased fingerlings is excellent.
Table 3: Size and prices for final products nursed in floating raceways
Species Size at harvest
from FRs (cm)
Production cost
per fish (VND)
Market price
(VND)
Profit margin
Barramundi 10 1,835 7,000 2.82
Grouper 12 7,391 16,000 1.16
Cobia 20 9,596 20,000 1.08
The lack of detailed information on production cost of these species when produced by
either nursing them in concrete tank or earthern pond makes it difficult for exact comparison.
However, the following information can be used for rough comparison:
• In Vietnam, cobia can only be nursed in concrete tanks. Nursing the fish in coastal
ponds, e.g. at Hoang Ky Co. was found associated with high rate of parasite
infection that caused massive mortality later (Nhu Van Can – RIA1, Niels
Sevennevig – Marine Farm, pers. comm.). The maximum size of the fish when
nursed in concrete tank is 10 cm total length. That is because of limited standing
biomass. The most appropriate density for nursing in concrete tank is 1,000 fish/m3
with 200% water exchange daily (Nhu Van Can – RIA1, pers. comm.). Thus, to
nurse 45,000 fingerlings we need 45 m3 of tank. The costs for construction of tank,
exchange of water and water treatment are outweighed the capital cost for 3 units
of SMART-2 floating raceways. Furthermore, the fish can be grown up to 20 cm
total length in floating raceways, not in concrete tanks.
• Regarding groupers the Taiwan – Vietnam Aquaculture Ltd. Co. in Phu Yen
Province or Hoang Ky Co. in Khanh Hoa Province who specializes in grouper
breeding and nursing can only sell 12-cm Malaba groupers at the price of VND
22,000/fish and VND 20,000/fish, respectively, to gain some profit. Given the
calculation in Table, the Malaba groupers if nursed in floating raceways can be sold
as low as VND 10,000/fish.
• For barramundi it is estimated that a 10-cm fingerling can not be sold at prices
lower than VND 6,000 if nursed in concrete tanks or VND 4,000 if nursed in
earthern ponds (Vo Dinh Linh – Ben Tre Department of Fisheries, pers. comm.).
Meanwhile the production cost for a 10-cm fingerling is only between VND 1,350
and 2,560.
2.2 Extension services
During 24 months of operation the CARD VIE062/04 Project had organized three extension
workshops and four presenations to potential users in Vietnam and overseas (Table 4). This
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 13
demonstrated not only untiring efforts of the project staff but also increasing interests of the local
aquaculture industry.
Table 4: Extension workshops to disseminate project outcomes in Vietnam
Date Place Organizers/Content No. of attendants
Jan 06 KFEC, Ninh Loc CARD VIE062/04
Principles of floating raceways
and application for aquaculture
60 farmers and
extension workers
of Khanh Hoa
Dec 06 Nha Trang
University
CARD VIE062/04
Project outcomes in two countries
Vietnam and Australia
More than 100
farmers, extension
workers, students
and staff of NTU
Feb 07 San Antonio,
Texas, USA
World Aquaculture Society
Project outcomes in two countries
Vietnam and Australia
1,700
April 07 Hue Hue Agriculture & Forestry Uni.
Using SMART-1 and SMART-3
for marine finfish fingerling
production
40 plus
May 07 Cam Ranh,
Khanh Hoa
Khanh Hoa Fisheries Extension
Center
Improving yield of marine fish
farming by using large-sized
fingerlings
50 plus local
farmers
Aug 07 Hanoi Ministry of Fisheries of Vietnam
and World Aquaculture Society
Exhibition booth about floating
raceway technology + 2 oral
presentations
1,200
Figure 1: First extension workshop (left); introducing new technology to private company (right)
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 14
Figure 2: Clockwise: visitors came to see floating raceways at KFEC, discussing with Phat Fish
Co. in Vung Tau about using floating raceways intead of tanks for fingerling production,
extension workshop and exhibition booth in Hanoi.
2.3 Development of marine fish farming in local areas
The CARD VIE062/04 Project was developed in 2004 when marine fish farming in Khanh
Hoa Province and Vietnam was still at a very infant stage. Despite the ambitious plan of the
Vietnamese government of producing 20,000 tons of marine fish by 2010 the industry has slowly
developed and even tended to shrink in 2007 (Figure 1). Constrainsts for further development
include the lacks of
• capital investment,
• quality, large-sized fingerlings for stocking,
• suitable commercial pellets for grow-out (the industry currently relies heavily on the
use of trash fish for feeding)
• mass production farming facilities (e.g. large sea cages)
In 2004-2005, at the inception of the CARD VIE062/04, mariculture in Khanh Hoa Province
confined by three majour groups: marine prawns (mainly Penaeus monodon), greeen mussels
(Perna viridis) and spiny rock lobsters (mainly Panulirus ornatus). There was only one
Taiwanese farm in Van Ninh who started trials on grow-out production of cobia (Rachycentron
canadum) in large sea cages; and one Norwegian farm (Marine Farm) which was still under
planning and construction. Nonetheless, The successes of barramundi seed production of Nha
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 15
Trang University and grouper seed production of Hoang Ky Company in Khanh Hoa had actively
pushed marine fish farming in the area up to a new level.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Production (tons)
Figure 3: Production of marine finfish in Vietnam from 2004 to 2007 (MOFI 2007)
Quang Ninh, 3440
Hai Phong, 1200Nam Dinh, 720
Thanh Hoa, 45
Nghe An, 400
Ha Tinh, 350
Quang Binh, 2
Da Nang, 50
Phu Yen, 162
Ba Ria Vung
Tau, 95
Kien Giang, 278
Khanh Hoa, 1560
Figure 4: Contribution of Khanh Hoa Province to the total production of marine
finfish farming of Vietnam in 2006
Our survey in early 2008 showed that the number of marine fish hatcheries kept rising in
Khanh Hoa Province, particularly for barramundi fry production (Figure 3). This should be
considered as a positive sign for development of marine fish farming in Khanh Hoa and Central
Vietnam, and might explain why Khanh Hoa contributed 18.7% to the total production of cultured
marine finfish of Vietnam in 2006 (Figure 4).
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2004 2005 2006 2007
N
um
be
r o
f h
at
ch
er
ie
s
Year
Grouper Barramundi Cobia
Figure 5: Development of hatcheries system for marine finfish seed production
in Khanh Hoa Province
Although the maximum size of barramundi fingerlings that sold from these local hatcheries
can be 5 cm total length, more than 95% of their products were marketed at a size of around 2.5
cm total length. In 2006 it is estimated that these hatcheries altogether produced about 12
million barramundi fingerlings at the size of 2.5 cm total length (Hoang et al., unpublished). This
size is certainly too small for stocking in both grow-out ponds or sea cages. According to Khanh
Hoa Fisheries Extension Center direct stocking of these barramundi in coastal ponds for grow-
out in Cam Ranh has resulted in very poor survival (less than 20%), severely compromising
yield and profit of fish farmers (Nguyen Thi Hau, person. comm.). For those who produced or
nursed groupers and cobia, sizes for selling was 4 – 6 cm for groupers and 6 – 14 cm for cobia.
These are all lower than the required size for high performance in grow-out.
Figure 6: Barramundi fingerlings produced in local hatcheries (left) and packing for sale (right)
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 17
Our survey on 50 randomly-selected fish farms in early 2008 in Khanh Hoa province
showed that the sizes of barramundi that grow-out fish farmers want varies from 4 to 12 cm. For
those who culture this species the minimum size should be 3 ÷ 4 cm for pond culture and 8 ÷ 10
cm for cage culture (Hoang et al., unpublished). Similarly, Nha Trang Pearl Co. and Marine
Farm Co. who culture cobia in Khanh Hoa all require cobia fingerlings larger than 20 cm in
length and they are from satisfied with current supplies, mainly from Research Institute for
Aquaculture No.1 (RIA1). Therefore, an advanced nursing period is, needed for all three
species; and for cobia there is no better option than using the floating raceways for advanced
nursing (see Milestone report No.5).
Here the role and potential impact of this CARD VIE062/04 Project becomes more obvious
as it helped produce large fingerlings for stocking by local fish farmers. During the period
between early 2006 and late 2007, large-sized fingerlings of barramundi (6-10 cm) were only
available at Khanh Hoa Fisheries Extension Center, the principal partner of our CARD
VIE062/04 Project to supply local demands. Feedbacks from local farmers have been positive
(i.e. fast growth and relatively high survival). As a result KFEC signed a contract in April 2008 to
help an American company (Australis) nurse 250,000 large fingerlings of barramundi a month in
Nha Trang. This company will then distribute the fish to its contracted farmers for grow-out in
Khanh Hoa and Phu Yen provinces. In addition, the number of aquaculture enterprises that
started or planned to use floating raceways for barramundi fingerling production keep increasing,
showing a positive impact of the CARD 062/04 Project (see Technology Uptake). Despite some
initial dicussions in 2007 the most successful cobia fingerling producer in Vietnam – RIA1 has
not adopted this innovative technology and still not able to meet the local demand for large-sized
fingerlings of cobia.
Figure 7: Healthy cobia nursed in floating raceways at Khanh Hoa Fisheries Extension Center in
Khanh Hoa Province in 2007
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 18
3. TECHNOLOGY UPTAKE
To date, a number of enterprises in Vietnam have adopted floating raceways for their
aquaculture production. Details are as follows:
• Minh Thuan Co. (Vietnam): this company has for a long time focused on the
production of prawn postlarvae (Penaeus monodon). In late 2007 the company
started to produce fry of barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Realized that large size
fingerlings of barramundi are needed for stocking in the Central and South Vietnam,
the company is setting up two nursery systems one in Ninh Thuan and the other in
Ben Tre, using floating raceways (SMART-1 design) for advanced nursing of
barramundi from 2 cm up to 6 – 10 cm total length. The company also intend to trial
floating raceways for fingerling production of Pangasius catfish.
• Australis (USA): this company is currently supplying large fingerlings of barramundi
to local farmers in Central Vietnam and will buy back the products for exporting to
US markets. Australis expressed their interest of using SMART-2 for fingerling
production of barramundi when visited the Project’s Exhibition Booth at APC
Aquaculture 2007 Conference in Hanoi in August 2007. In April 2008 Australis
signed a contract of with the Khanh Hoa Fisheries Extension Center to use the
existing facilities of the CARD VIE062/04 Project and built up 6 new SMART-2
raceways to nurse barramundi fingerlings. The company aims to produced 250,000
fingerlings of 10 cm total length a month.
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 19
Figure 8: Construting the mould for building 25-m3 fiberglass floating raceways to
grow eels in Phu Yen Province (Photo: Hoang Tung)
Figure 8: Installing SMART-2 for monosex tilapia fingerling production at
Binh Dinh Fisheries Extension Center (Photo: Hoang Tung)
• Viet Seabass Co. (Vietnam): based in Vung Tau this company was established in
2007 to address increasing demand for barramundi fingerlings in Vietnam. Right
from the start the company decided to use floating raceway technology for
advanced nursing of barramundi from 2 cm to 10 cm total length. Aiming to produce
100 million barramundi fry a month VietSeabass is now constructing its first floating
raceway system in Vung Tau.
• Truong Thanh Co. (Vietnam): this company is interested to use floating raceways for
growing out eels (Anguilla mamorata) in Phu Yen province. Since the floating
raceways are placed in a large agricultural reservoir, similar design as for SMART-2
was applied, but the working volume is much larger (25 m3 compared with 6 m3 of
SMART-2). Grow-out trials started early 2008.
• Binh Dinh Province’s Fisheries Extension Center (Vietnam): the Center is trialling
floating raceways (SMART-2) for monosex tilapia fingerling production in Binh Dinh.
• There are a number of organizations that are intested in using floating raceways for
nursing of glass eels including Department of Agriculture of Ca Mau Province and
Milestone report No.8 | CARD VIE062/04 PROJECT 20
Research Institute for Aquaculture No.3 (Nha Trang) or grouper fingerlings in Thanh
Phu, Ben Tre.
Given the fact that this research project CARD VIE062/04 was completed in late 2007 the
aforementioned information about technology uptake is considered positive. It takes sometimes
for the local aquaculture industries in both country to know and adopt this new technology.
Therefore, the impacts of this project can only be fully recognized in a few years time. It is
recommended that the CARD Program should assist with the dissemination of research
outcomes of not only this project but also many others to different parts of Vietnam.
For further information, please contact:
Dr. Hoang Tung
School of Biotechnology
International University, HCMC
Vietnam
Email: htung@hcmiu.edu.vn
Phone: +84.979710372
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- Báo cáo nghiên cứu khoa học Evaluation of contribution of floating raceway technology to the development of marine finfish farming in Australia and Vietnam - MILESTONE REPORT NO.8.pdf