Tài liệu Bài giảng Crafting & Executing Strategy - Ch 6: Strengthening a company’s competitive position: strategic moves, timing, and scope of operations: CHAPTER 6STRENGTHENING A COMPANY’S COMPETITIVE POSITION: STRATEGIC MOVES, TIMING, AND SCOPE OF OPERATIONSSTUDENT VERSIONMAXIMIZING THE POWER OF A STRATEGYOffensive and Defensive Competitive ActionsCompetitive Dynamics and the Timing of Strategic MovesScope of Operations along the Industry’s Value ChainMaking choices that complement a competitive approach andmaximize the power of strategyGOING ON THE OFFENSIVE—STRATEGIC OPTIONS TO IMPROVE A FIRM’S MARKET POSITIONStrategic Offensive Principles:Focus on relentlessly building competitive advantage and then converting it into sustainable advantage.Apply resources where rivals are least able to defend themselves.Employ the element of surprise as opposed to doing what rivals expect and are prepared for.Display a strong bias for swift, decisive, and overwhelming actions to overpower rivals.6–3CHOOSING WHICH RIVALS TO ATTACKMarket leaders that are in vulnerable competitive positionsRunner-up firms with weaknessesin areas where the...
20 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghanh66 | Lượt xem: 658 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Bài giảng Crafting & Executing Strategy - Ch 6: Strengthening a company’s competitive position: strategic moves, timing, and scope of operations, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
CHAPTER 6STRENGTHENING A COMPANY’S COMPETITIVE POSITION: STRATEGIC MOVES, TIMING, AND SCOPE OF OPERATIONSSTUDENT VERSIONMAXIMIZING THE POWER OF A STRATEGYOffensive and Defensive Competitive ActionsCompetitive Dynamics and the Timing of Strategic MovesScope of Operations along the Industry’s Value ChainMaking choices that complement a competitive approach andmaximize the power of strategyGOING ON THE OFFENSIVE—STRATEGIC OPTIONS TO IMPROVE A FIRM’S MARKET POSITIONStrategic Offensive Principles:Focus on relentlessly building competitive advantage and then converting it into sustainable advantage.Apply resources where rivals are least able to defend themselves.Employ the element of surprise as opposed to doing what rivals expect and are prepared for.Display a strong bias for swift, decisive, and overwhelming actions to overpower rivals.6–3CHOOSING WHICH RIVALS TO ATTACKMarket leaders that are in vulnerable competitive positionsRunner-up firms with weaknessesin areas where the challenger is strongStruggling enterprises on the verge of going underSmall local and regional firms with limited capabilitiesBest Targets for Offensive Attacks BLUE-OCEAN STRATEGY—A SPECIAL KIND OF OFFENSIVEThe business universe is divided into:An existing market with boundaries and rules in which rival firms compete for advantage.A “blue ocean” market space, where the industry has not yet taken shape, with no rivals and wide-open long-term growth and profit potential for a firm that can create demand for new types of products. 6–5DEFENSIVE STRATEGIES—PROTECTING MARKET POSITION AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGELower the firm’s risk of being attacked Weaken the impact of an attack that does occurInfluence challengers to aim their efforts at other rivalsPurposes of Defensive StrategiesTIMING A FIRM’S OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE STRATEGIC MOVESTiming’s Importance:Knowing when to make a strategic move is as crucial as knowing what move to make.Moving first is no guarantee of success or competitive advantage.The risks of moving first to stake out a monopoly position must be carefully weighed.6–7CONDITIONS THAT LEAD TO FIRST-MOVER ADVANTAGESWhen pioneering helps build a firm’s reputation and creates strong brand loyalty.When a first mover’s customers will thereafter face significant switching costs.When property rights protections thwart rapid imitation of the initial move.When an early lead enables movement down the learning curve ahead of rivals.When a first mover can set the technical standard for the industry.6–8THE POTENTIAL FOR LATE-MOVER ADVANTAGES OR FIRST-MOVER DISADVANTAGESWhen pioneering is more costly than imitating and offers negligible experience or learning-curve benefits.When the products of an innovator are somewhat primitive and do not live up to buyer expectations.When rapid market evolution allows fast followers to leapfrog a first mover’s products with more attractive next-version products.When market uncertainties make it difficult to ascertain what will eventually succeed.6–9STRENGTHENING A FIRM’S MARKET POSITION VIA ITS SCOPE OF OPERATIONSRange of its activities performed internallyBreadth of its product and service offeringsExtent of its geographic market presence and its mix of businessesSize of its competitive footprint on its market or industryDefining the Scope of the Firm’s Operations HORIZONTAL MERGER ANDACQUISITION STRATEGIESMergerIs the combining of two or more firms into a single corporate entity that often takes on a new name.AcquisitionIs a combination in which one firm, the acquirer, purchases and absorbs the operations of another firm, the acquired.6–11STRATEGIC OJECTIVES FOR HORIZONTAL MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONSCreating a more cost-efficient operation out of the combined companies.Expanding the firm’s geographic coverage.Extending the firm’s business into new product categories.Gaining quick access to new technologies or complementary resources and capabilities.Leading the convergence of industries whose boundaries are being blurred by changing technologies and new market opportunities.6–12TYPES OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION STRATEGIESFull IntegrationPartial IntegrationTaperedIntegrationVertical Integration ChoicesTHE ADVANTAGES OF A VERTICAL INTEGRATION STRATEGYAdd materially to a firm’s technological capabilitiesStrengthen the firm’s competitive positionBoost the firm’s profitabilityBenefits of a Vertical Integration StrategyINTEGRATING BACKWARD TO ACHIEVE GREATER COMPETITIVENESSIntegrating Backwards By:Achieving same scale economies as outside suppliers—low-cost based competitive advantage.Matching or beating suppliers’ production efficiency with no drop-off in quality—differentiation-based competitive advantage.Reasons for Integrating Backwards:Reduction of supplier powerReduction in costs of major inputsAssurance of the supply and flow of critical inputsProtection of proprietary know-how6–15INTEGRATING FORWARD TO ENHANCE COMPETITIVENESSReasons for Integrating Forward:To lower overall costs by increasing channel activity efficiencies relative to competitors.To increase bargaining power through control of channel activities.To gain better access to end users.To strengthen and reinforce brand awareness.To increase product differentiation.6–16FACTORS THAT MAKE AN ALLIANCE “STRATEGIC”It facilitates achievement of an important business objective.It helps build, sustain, or enhance a core competence or competitive advantage.It helps block a competitive threat.It helps remedy an important resource deficiency or competitive weakness.It increases the bargaining power of alliance members over suppliers or buyers.It helps open up important new market opportunities.It mitigates a significant risk to a firm’s business.6–17REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO STRATEGIC ALLIANCESWhen seeking global market leadership:Enter into critical country markets quickly.Gain inside knowledge about unfamiliar markets and cultures through alliances with local partners.Provide access to valuable skills and competencies concentrated in particular geographic locations.When staking out a strong industry position:Establish a stronger beachhead in target industry.Master new technologies and build expertise and competencies.Open up broader opportunities in the target industry.6–18CAPTURING THE BENEFITS OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCESPicking a good partnerBeing sensitive to cultural differencesRecognizing that the alliance must benefit both sidesAdjusting the agreement over time to fit new circumstancesStructuring the decision-making process for swift actionsEnsuring both parties keep their commitmentsStrategic Alliance FactorsSTRATEGIC ALLIANCES VERSUS OUTSOURCINGKey Advantages of Strategic Alliances:The increased ability to exercise control over the partners’ activities.A greater commitment and willingness of the partners to make relationship-specific investments as opposed to arm’s-length outsourcing transactions.6–20
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- spptchap006_0719.pptx